NETWORK NATION  
  Pattern of the whole
Remember me?
Email
Password
Join us | Get your password | Vision | Topics | Home
NCDD TRANSPARTISAN

Join us | Topics | Home | Collaborative Backbone | Quotes | Teilhard deChardin | Focalpoint | Shared Purpose | NCDD Transpartisan | Mapping | Circle | Pattern


NCDD TRANSPARTISAN
All messages

Sender: Rickrad
Subject: Re: Transpartisan map
Date: Mon, Jun 2, 2014
Msg: 101051

I got a report that the image (the map) didn't attach properly last time. ?So here is the map again (attached).

TranspartisanMap.png

- Rick Raddatz

p.s. The reason this is a *transpartisan* map is that the entire political spectrum can agree that the five ambition/resource conflicts exist, and that sets up the rest of the "map". Notice that this approach completely -- and naturally -- eliminates the "left / right" dividing line while still mapping the issues that define both sides.

On May 30, 2014, at 02:51 PM, "Rickrad" wrote:

> Our goal this month, as per Mark Gerzon's initial post, was to make a map of the transpartisan landscape. > > I would like to propose this map (image below / attached). > > In the left column we see the five ambition / resource conflicts that exist whether we like it or not. > The shaded rows describe modern government -- the solution our founding fathers came up with. > The white areas extend the founders' logic to the rest of the problem space. > > It may not be obvious, but absolutely any issue can be placed on this map. Immigration and abortion, for example > are about drawing the line about what constitutes a full individual (an individual with rights) in our society. > Tax policy is about drawing a line between the individual and the collective. > What politicians are allowed to do or not do is the line between the collective and political. > Our borders are the line between our political world and foreign nations. > What property rights we give to future generations is the line between we-the-living (first 4 rows) and the future. > > It's a different map than I suspect Mark Gerzon -- or anyone -- was thinking of... but worthy of consideration, > I believe. > > > > - Rick Raddatz, http://IncentiveReform.org > >

############################

To unsubscribe from the TRANSPARTISAN list: write to: mailto:TRANSPARTISAN-SIGNOFF-REQUEST@LISTS.THATAWAY.ORG or click the following link: http://lists.thataway.org/scripts/wa-THATAWAY.exe?SUBED1=TRANSPARTISAN&A=1


Book
Group
Issue
Person
Theme
Website
Anger and partisan rage
Attention Economy
Basic principles for a Transpartisan movement
Centrism
Collaborative problem solving
Common ground
Community
Community conversations
Conscious business
Creating transpartisan consensus
Crisis of democracy
Dynamic Facilitation
Facilitated conversation/dialogue
For transpartisanism to be successful, people must transform their most basic beliefs
Holding the tension of our differences while working together with respect and an open heart
Inclusion
Integral democracy
Integral politics
Integral thinking
Internet support for dialog and action
Out of Many, One - E Pluribus Unum
Partisan bubbles
Partisan disfunction
Political revolution
Psychological overload
Public choice economics
Science and accurate thinking
Stratified Democracy
Teleology and cultural evolution
Transpartisan alliance on specific issue
Uninvolved citizen
Unity and diversity
Unprecedented new approaches
Us versus Them
Voter ignorance
Weave together a movement of many initiatives
What is "transpartisan"?
Wisdom Council
Wisdom in society
Work together to create an activist vision