NETWORK NATION  
  Pattern of the whole
Remember me?
Email
Password
Join us | Get your password | Vision | Topics | Home
NCDD TRANSPARTISAN

Join us | Topics | Home | Collaborative Backbone | Quotes | Teilhard deChardin | Focalpoint | Shared Purpose | NCDD Transpartisan | Mapping | Circle | Pattern


NCDD TRANSPARTISAN
All messages

Sender: Steven H Johnson
Subject: The high level challenge of modern society
Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2014
Msg: 100904

Hi everyone -

I have a thought process about modern society to float here.

Let's start by acknowledging that we live in cause-and-effect world. Not entirely, of course, but substantially.

And it's a world in which many activities take place at great scale, and generate consequences at great scale, sometimes for good and sometimes for ill.

There are different ways to respond.

I can assert my rights and take actions without regard for their consequences. If the consequences are damaging, my assertion of rights restricts the reach of other folks' freedom.

Or I can accept responsibility for the consequences of my behavior, and act within my responsibilities. As I do, my restraint preserves the freedoms of others.

When rights come first, when behaviors at scale cause damage at scale, freedom shrinks.

When responsibilities come first, when well-chosen behaviors at scale avoid causing harm at scale, freedom expands.

Rights exercised without responsibilities cause harm, sometimes at vast scale, and damage society's larger freedoms.

Rights exercised within a framework of responsibilities avoid harm, and preserve society's larger freedoms.

Early reformers used the claim of natural rights to discredit the powers of kings. They didn't have to worry about modern industry and threats to Nature. But we do. Shall we continue to accept the argument of natural rights as framed in a pre-industrial era? Or is it time to make some adjustments?

Rights. Freedoms. Responsibilities. Cause-and-Effect. Vast Scale. Vast Behaviors, Vast Consequences. The mix of concerns that draw our attentions today have changed considerably from the mix of concerns that stirred earlier periods of reform. Are we ready to re-balance our thinking?

Steve Johnson Annapolis ############################

To unsubscribe from the TRANSPARTISAN list: write to: mailto:TRANSPARTISAN-SIGNOFF-REQUEST@LISTS.THATAWAY.ORG or click the following link: http://lists.thataway.org/scripts/wa-THATAWAY.exe?SUBED1=TRANSPARTISAN&A=1


Book
Group
Issue
Person
Theme
Website
Anger and partisan rage
Attention Economy
Basic principles for a Transpartisan movement
Centrism
Collaborative problem solving
Common ground
Community
Community conversations
Conscious business
Creating transpartisan consensus
Crisis of democracy
Dynamic Facilitation
Facilitated conversation/dialogue
For transpartisanism to be successful, people must transform their most basic beliefs
Holding the tension of our differences while working together with respect and an open heart
Inclusion
Integral democracy
Integral politics
Integral thinking
Internet support for dialog and action
Out of Many, One - E Pluribus Unum
Partisan bubbles
Partisan disfunction
Political revolution
Psychological overload
Public choice economics
Science and accurate thinking
Stratified Democracy
Teleology and cultural evolution
Transpartisan alliance on specific issue
Uninvolved citizen
Unity and diversity
Unprecedented new approaches
Us versus Them
Voter ignorance
Weave together a movement of many initiatives
What is "transpartisan"?
Wisdom Council
Wisdom in society
Work together to create an activist vision