NETWORK NATION  
  Pattern of the whole
Remember me?
Email
Password
Join us | Get your password | Vision | Topics | Home
NCDD TRANSPARTISAN

Join us | Topics | Home | Collaborative Backbone | Quotes | Teilhard deChardin | Focalpoint | Shared Purpose | NCDD Transpartisan | Mapping | Circle | Pattern


NCDD TRANSPARTISAN
All messages

Sender: Rickrad
Subject: Conservatives
Date: Sun, Apr 27, 2014
Msg: 100947

About a month ago, someone commented that the transpartisan movement seemed to be dominated by left-leaning individuals and that this is a problem.

I would like to suggest a possible cause and two possible solutions.

I believe the cause of the problem is actually quite simple: conservative philosophy (with a few notable exceptions) is about limiting government and since government is currently dramatically beyond such limits, conservative philosophy is unavoidably a "no compromise" type of philosophy. A compromise to them, is a loss. So even a dialog is a loss -- or at least it feels like it to them. (A debate, on the other hand, they love, but that's different)

Left-leaning philosophy and moderate philosophy, on the other hand, is more about "let's come together and help each other" and this philosophy is more naturally transpartisan. In fact, this allows left-leaning people to claim the mantle of transpartisanship even if they truly aren't transpartisan -- because any dialog is a win, or at least it feels that way. Something to think about.

Here are two possible solutions...

SOLUTION #1: THE UNDERDOG STRATEGY

One way to get conservatives on board the transpartisan train is to look for places where conservatives are weakest -- e.g. San Francisco, the north east, or inner cities -- and focus on building dialog-structures there. To put it simply, conservatives in such areas benefit hugely from structured dialog since they effectively have no voice via the more formal political processes.

SOLUTION #2: CAP-AND-PRIORITIZE

If a right-leaning person is offered the limits they want in the context of a larger deal, you will find them willing to enter the dialog enthusiastically -- because they feel like they already won. This is the idea behind the cap-and-prioritize reform I keep talking about. (details at IncentiveReform.org)

Hope this helps.

- Rick Raddatz Founder, http://IncentiveReform.org 303-949-8075

? ############################

To unsubscribe from the TRANSPARTISAN list: write to: mailto:TRANSPARTISAN-SIGNOFF-REQUEST@LISTS.THATAWAY.ORG or click the following link: http://lists.thataway.org/scripts/wa-THATAWAY.exe?SUBED1=TRANSPARTISAN&A=1


Book
Group
Issue
Person
Theme
Website
Anger and partisan rage
Attention Economy
Basic principles for a Transpartisan movement
Centrism
Collaborative problem solving
Common ground
Community
Community conversations
Conscious business
Creating transpartisan consensus
Crisis of democracy
Dynamic Facilitation
Facilitated conversation/dialogue
For transpartisanism to be successful, people must transform their most basic beliefs
Holding the tension of our differences while working together with respect and an open heart
Inclusion
Integral democracy
Integral politics
Integral thinking
Internet support for dialog and action
Out of Many, One - E Pluribus Unum
Partisan bubbles
Partisan disfunction
Political revolution
Psychological overload
Public choice economics
Science and accurate thinking
Stratified Democracy
Teleology and cultural evolution
Transpartisan alliance on specific issue
Uninvolved citizen
Unity and diversity
Unprecedented new approaches
Us versus Them
Voter ignorance
Weave together a movement of many initiatives
What is "transpartisan"?
Wisdom Council
Wisdom in society
Work together to create an activist vision